converting xyz rotation to something else
Hi all
I need to convert a rotation that is stored in the format xyz where x is the angle of rotation about the x axis, y the rotation about the y axis, z about z, and the rotations are preformed in that order.
I need this rotation in either an axisangle, a euler angle, or matrix, it does not matter which.
Does anyone know how to do this? I'm currently looking over maths pages but without a huge amount of luck.
Cheers,
David
I need to convert a rotation that is stored in the format xyz where x is the angle of rotation about the x axis, y the rotation about the y axis, z about z, and the rotations are preformed in that order.
I need this rotation in either an axisangle, a euler angle, or matrix, it does not matter which.
Does anyone know how to do this? I'm currently looking over maths pages but without a huge amount of luck.
Cheers,
David
Chopper, iSight Screensavers, DuckDuckDuck: http://majicjungle.com
that's already euler angles...
probably the easiest is to treat it as three axisangle rotations, generate 3x3 matrices for each, and multiply the matrices to get the combined rotation matrix.
probably the easiest is to treat it as three axisangle rotations, generate 3x3 matrices for each, and multiply the matrices to get the combined rotation matrix.
it seemed from what I read that the euler angles I have to convert to were zxz...
But yeh, that sounds good, I've tried genertaing the matrix all at once, but I think I do need to generate all 3 and multiply them all together. Cheers.
David
But yeh, that sounds good, I've tried genertaing the matrix all at once, but I think I do need to generate all 3 and multiply them all together. Cheers.
David
Chopper, iSight Screensavers, DuckDuckDuck: http://majicjungle.com
If you know you need to multiply all three together beforehand (and may be doing this a lot) it may be worth the time to pop open maple or matlab and work out the coefficients. I've done it in the past when I was trying to work an algorithm to break a matrix back into euler angles, and IIRC the resulting matrix wasn't all that bad. I think 5 terms at most for a given element in the resulting 3x3 matrix, but much cheaper then doing 3 full matrix multiplies.
[edit: even without maple it would probably take only a few minutes to work out by hand..]
[edit: even without maple it would probably take only a few minutes to work out by hand..]
i have this strange algorithm for applying 3 rotations on the rows of the canonial basis (here its on the columns and transposing at the end), i think i should try to simplify this sometime.
Code:
column[0] = Vector3f(1,0,0);
column[1] = Vector3f(0,1,0);
column[2] = Vector3f(0,0,1);
for(int i = 0 ; i < 3 ; i++) {
column[i] = Vector3f(
column[i].x,
cos(x)*column[i].y + sin(x)*column[i].z,
cos(x)*column[i].z  sin(x)*column[i].y );
column[i] = Vector3f(
cos(y)*column[i].x  sin(y)*column[i].z,
column[i].y,
cos(y)*column[i].z + sin(y)*column[i].x );
column[i] = Vector3f(
cos(z)*column[i].x + sin(z)*column[i].y,
cos(z)*column[i].y  sin(z)*column[i].x,
column[i].z );
}
T();
I'd think that just concatenating 3 quaternions and then converting to a matrix would be the fastest way to do that. It would probably also be the fastest way to get angle axis. And it would be the fastest way to get a quaternion.
Thanks guys, this worked in the end. It does not need to be fast at this stage as it is only when called once per model at load time. (The matrix order is a bit funny because of the way ODE seems to need it)
David
David
Code:
rotationMatrix[0] = cos(y) * cos(z);
rotationMatrix[4] = cos(y) * sin(z);
rotationMatrix[8] = sin(y);
rotationMatrix[3] = 0;
rotationMatrix[1] = sin(x) * sin(y) * cos(z) + cos(x) * sin(z);
rotationMatrix[5] = sin(x) * sin(y) * sin(z) + cos(x) * cos(z);
rotationMatrix[9] = sin(x) * cos(y);
rotationMatrix[7] = 0;
rotationMatrix[2] = cos(x) * sin(y) * cos(z) + sin(x) * sin(z);
rotationMatrix[6] = cos(x) * sin(y) * sin(z) + sin(x) * cos(z);
rotationMatrix[10] = cos(x) * cos(y);
rotationMatrix[11] = 0;
Chopper, iSight Screensavers, DuckDuckDuck: http://majicjungle.com
One quick thing  since you use sin(x) and friends multiple times, you should just store them in temporary variables instead of recalculating. I know it doesn't need to be fast, but still...
Check the generated code first  GCC should be "smart" enough to elide multiple identical calls to trig functions. Dunno if it really is though
Probably depends on the debugging level. I would actually hope that it doesn't at the O0 level as that might cause confusion over line numbers. At O2 I would really hope so!
In general I make it a practice to precalc and cache multiply used trig functions or inverses of denominators in code.
In general I make it a practice to precalc and cache multiply used trig functions or inverses of denominators in code.
Possibly Related Threads...
Thread:  Author  Replies:  Views:  Last Post  
Converting (x, y) into NESW direction  unknown  19  11,122 
Nov 2, 2005 09:52 AM Last Post: Zekaric 

Converting Int To String  Nick  4  14,633 
Jun 2, 2005 02:13 AM Last Post: hangt5 

Converting strings to functions  Joseph Duchesne  10  5,835 
Feb 23, 2005 11:42 PM Last Post: Skorche 